Extra point rule changes are a solution in search of a problem
Commentary by Mark Schultz
At the recently concluded NFL Competition Committee meetings, the committee proposed to change the extra point rules (PAT), but tabled any votes on the subject when members could not reach a consensus. The NFL will reconsider changing the PAT rules in May, according to recent reports. The details have yet to be worked out, but the general idea is to move extra point kicks out to a greater distance, while keeping the two point conversion attempt in close to the goal line. According to reports, a super majority of the owners agree that the PAT rules should change, so there is momentum behind changing the PAT. Is is unclear what the final rule will be, but all indications point to longer extra point kicks in the 2015 season.
The rationale for the change is that PAT kicks today are almost automatic – over 99-percent of the conversion kicks have been good in the last three seasons. If the PAT kicks are moved out 10 to 15 yards it will create some tension and drama as a team would look to tie or take the lead “pending the extra point.”
I have one question for the owners and when it comes to the proposed rule changes to make extra point kick harder. Why?! Is pro football that boring of a game that the NFL needs to come up with NASCAR-type rules to contrive drama and excitement? Isn’t the game exciting enough? The PAT always follows a touchdown – itself an exciting play, whether a one-yard plunge or a 99-yard bomb. The current rules leave room for drama as coaches have to decide whether or not to go for two or kick the PAT.
The NFL has bigger fish to fry. It needs to come up with new rules and technologies to keep players as safe as possible as class-action lawyers salivate over the game and soccer moms think twice about before allowing their child to play tackle football. The safety rules enacted in the last few years have already impacted the style of play on the field. The NFL doesn’t need to radically change other aspects of the game. Extra point kicks should be very low on the list of things to change in the game.
Not every play in a NFL game needs to be a life-or-death drama. Leave the humble PAT alone.
6 thoughts on “Extra point rule changes aren’t dead yet – owners to reconsider in May”
I wish they would abandon the 1 pt attempt entirely. A a two point conversion attempt after every TD would add both purpose and excitement to an otherwise ho hum aspect of the game.
The current rule is broken. If something is so easy that it succeeds over 99% of the time then a change must be made.
Some possible solutions are:
– Eliminate tries. Make touchdowns 7 points.
– Keep the try but take away the field goal option. Teams must always go for 2 points.
– Keep the field goal option but make the kick much harder either by making the goal smaller (posts not as far apart)….or making it harder by having the kick from farther away.
Leave things as they are now. There are way too many rules in football now. The problem as in all sports is overpaid mollionaires who don’t give it their all when it matters. And too many recycled head coaches too but that’s a whole another argument….
The officials have enough to rememeber now. It’s turned into the Nat’l Rules League……
I’d like to see an experiment with the position of a PAT if elected to kick.
This would basically adopt the way they take conversions in Rugby Union – with the ball positioned on the 20 yard line – but level with where the player scoring the touchdown first took the ball into the endzone was.
This might result in PATs being attempted from near enough on the sidelines as opposed to always within the hashmarks – thereby making them a bit harder.
Comments are closed.