Football Zebras
NewsRiveron explains Bears’ TD overturn, predecessors skeptical

Riveron explains Bears’ TD overturn, predecessors skeptical

NFL vice president for officiating, Alberto Riveron, explained why he overturned Zach Miller’s touchdown catch on replay, but that explanation did not convince former officiating boss Mike Pereira.

Riveron explained (see Week 8 video) that as Miller’s first leg landed (the one horribly injured), the ball was moving. “Now we know that before he contacts the ground he must regain control of the football because the ball is loose,” he said. He continued, “As he is coming down, one more time we see ball is loose, and now we’re looking to make sure the ball doesn’t hit the ground because we know he does not have control….the ball is on the ground, we know he did not regain control and we have an incomplete pass.”

“We’re getting rulings 50 drunk guys in a bar don’t agree with”

Mike Pereira disagreed. The former officiating supervisor talked to “The Spiegel and Parkins Show” on WSCR-AM, The Score (see October 31 podcast interviews). Pereira is concerned about the direction of replay reviews. “You only make changes if there is indisputable visual evidence now called ‘clear and obvious,'” he said. He continued, “(Dean Blandino) and I were breaking down the play and we concluded that had they ruled incomplete, that we would have reversed it to a touchdown.”

Pereira further observed, “Zach is going to the ground…he doesn’t lose possession on the way to the ground, hits the ground in obvious pain, rolls over on his back still in possession of the ball and lets it go.” Periera and Blandino both agreed that Miller “survived the ground” and it should have been a touchdown. “Where is the ‘clear and obvious evidence’ to reverse it,” Pereira asked. “You do not change the call on the field due to slight movement (of the ball),” he added.

“We’re getting very concerned that the NFL office is getting way too technical reviewing these plays,” Pereira said of him and Blandino. 

“You’re taking a common sense ruling away from officials and reversing it on a technicality. We’re getting rulings that 50 drunk guys in a bar don’t agree with,” Pereira commented.

I am willing to predict that Riveron doesn’t appreciate Pereira’s and Blandino’s comments, but it is illustrative to see that instant replay reviews are an inexact science.

 

Mark Schultz
Mark Schultz

Mark Schultz is a high school football official, freelance writer and journalist. He first became interested in officiating when he was six years old, was watching a NFL game with his father and asked the fateful question, “Dad, what are those guys in the striped shirts doing?”

Similar Articles

2 thoughts on “Riveron explains Bears’ TD overturn, predecessors skeptical

  1. I don’t like Riveron’s reviews. I can’t see any clear evidence that he lost control. This should have stood as the officials called it on the field.

    For note: I am a Bears fan, and a sports official too.

  2. I like the 50 drunk guys in a bar comment. But you don’t have to be drunk to be upset about these rulings. The NFL has begun calling catches and possession, especially in the end zone, in ways that defy the common sense of longtime football fans as to what those actions consist of. What is the point of making and enforcing rules in a way that most of the games’ fans, players, and coaches find vague, confusing, and incorrect?

Post a comment using Wordpress.com, Twitter, Facebook, or Google+ account:

Top