<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Football Zebras.com &#187; scoreboard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballzebras.com/tag/scoreboard/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballzebras.com</link>
	<description>A look at the NFL&#039;s officials and the calls they make</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hochuli without primetime microphone, may be on defense for scoreboard peek</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/12/20/1403</link>
		<comments>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/12/20/1403#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Quarless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Belichick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devin McCourty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Hochuli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant replay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scoreboard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/12/20/1403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Week 15: Packers at Patriots Referee Ed Hochuli won&#8217;t have the benefit of his informative public-address announcements to defend a flag in the second quarter of the Sunday night game. Mike Reiss of ESPNBoston.com reports a helmet-to-helmet hit by Patriots cornerback Devin McCourty on Packers tight end Andrew Quarless was penalized 20 to 30 seconds after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Week 15: Packers at Patriots</h3>
<p>Referee Ed Hochuli won&#8217;t have the benefit of his <a href="/2010/12/19/1391" target="_blank">informative public-address announcements</a> to defend a flag in the second quarter of the Sunday night game.</p>
<p><a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4690074/picked-up-pieces-from-post-game">Mike Reiss of ESPNBoston.com reports</a> a helmet-to-helmet hit by Patriots cornerback Devin McCourty on Packers tight end Andrew Quarless was penalized 20 to 30 seconds after the play because Hochuli received visual confirmation from a scoreboard replay.</p>
<p>The scoreboard video can never be used by officials to make any ruling. Ever.</p>
<p>I have to see the video of the call myself, but it may not be relevant if Hochuli saw a penalizable action on the scoreboard. As the head referee, Hochuli doesn&#8217;t call downfield penalties, because his coverage area is the quarterback. However, Hochuli would make the ultimate call in a case where the covering officials are &#8220;tied&#8221; in their decision.</p>
<p>That said, the <em>appearance</em> of the use of the scoreboard video is troubling. This is likely to stoke the rumor mill, so I expect the league to make a statement on this by midweek, even if it is a one-sentence (or one-word) answer.</p>
<p>Also likely is that Patriots coach Bill Belichick will fry the video board director who rolled a replay that oddly may have <a href="/2010/12/01/1222">disadvantaged the home team</a>.</p>
<p>Belichick also addressed the <a href="/2010/12/12/1306" target="_blank">highly litigious Hochuli crew</a>: &#8220;Look these guys call the most penalties of any crew in the league. &#8230; We knew it was going to be a [tightly officiated] game, and it was. I&#8217;ve got to do a better job preparing the team.&#8221;<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/12/20/1403/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fix inequities built into replay system</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/12/01/1222</link>
		<comments>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/12/01/1222#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outside the Stripes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Falcons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Dome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replay malfunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scoreboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl XXXVIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Gonzalez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=1222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The replay system as we know it needs further review. We are going to be highlighting these in an on-going series. While we have said that having instant replay is not a backstop for overturning every missed call, its application in limited circumstances is very useful. However, the system is beginning to show some competitive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>The replay system as we know it needs further review. We are going to be highlighting these in an on-going series.</p></div>
<div>
<p>While we have said that having instant replay is not a backstop for overturning every missed call, its application in limited circumstances is very useful. However, the system is beginning to show some competitive inequities that must be resolved.</p></div>
<div><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<h3>Part 1. Equal access to game footage</h3>
<p>In 2007, the NFL upgraded its replay equipment to the same standard as the critics sitting in their Barcaloungers. However, each team must have the ability to make a fast decision on a replay that is not determined by a television director or Jumbotron operator.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1237" title="replaygfx" src="http://www.footballzebras.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/replaygfx1.gif" alt="replaygfx" width="242" height="165" />In a Week 12 game, the Packers had a potential situation to review a catch by Falcons tight end Tony Gonzalez. The coaches in the booth, however, were unable to make a decision in time, because the <a href="http://packersnews.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20101129/PKR01/101129153/1058/PKR03" target="_blank">Georgia Dome&#8217;s video feed was lagging behind by a play</a>. In a universe where hordes of people were able to verify within seconds that they saw Janet Jackson&#8217;s nipple in the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show, a team&#8217;s coaching staff should be able to render a decision on a replay within 10 seconds.</p>
<p>Also, it is known that stadium personnel do not show a replay of a questionable call on the stadium&#8217;s screens that might be an advantage to the opponents. Conversely, they will replay a close call that would advantage the home team.</p>
<p>The technology exists for each team plus the replay booth to be able to rewind the previous play and be able to change the camera angle while replaying. This should include the closed-circuit cameras for the in-stadium displays as well. This removes the burden off of a network television partner to deliver the proper replay at the proper time for there to be a challenge, either from the sideline or from the replay assistant.</p>
<p>It is also strange that, in 2010, there is a video delay of over 30 seconds. The league should be monitoring these feeds (if, in fact, the video feeds are the responsibility of the facility), and if the video lags behind, there must be some way to allow the system to dump its memory and reset itself quickly. When video trails so long when one team has the ball, then that is a competitive disadvantage. If something simple like a coach&#8217;s headset malfunctions on one sideline, the other team&#8217;s bench must forgo their working ones until the problem is corrected. (Technological improvements have made that measure a relic of the past.)</p>
<p>And, while we are on the subject, can the replay booth get one or two tape decks as a backup? We noted last year that the Dolphins were unable to execute a challenge because <a href="/2009/10/28/572" target="_blank">the replay system needed to be rebooted</a>. Even though the replay was available on the scoreboard and in the press box, those replays could not be fed through the replay equipment. After waiting the requisite two minutes (seriously, have you ever recovered from a system crash in two minutes?) the Dolphins were returned their challenge unused.</p>
<p>A trip to Radio Shack with less than $500 in your pocket can fix that.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/12/01/1222/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giants interception correctly goes to the spot of recovery, not spot of whistle</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/09/21/297</link>
		<comments>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/09/21/297#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broncos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Hochuli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Witten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenny Phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Carey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scoreboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Night Football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Week 2: Giants at Cowboys The amazing interception by the Giants&#8217; Kenny Phillips off of the foot of Cowboys&#8217; Jason Witten (video) could be the first use of what might be referred to as the &#8220;Ed Hochuli rule.&#8221; You may remember last year&#8217;s botched call in the Chargers–Broncos game where an incomplete pass ruling could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Week 2: Giants at Cowboys</h3>
<p>The amazing interception by the Giants&#8217; Kenny Phillips off of the foot of Cowboys&#8217; Jason Witten (<a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-cant-miss-plays/09000d5d812c88bb/WK-2-Can-t-Miss-Play-Off-the-heel-INT" target="_blank">video</a>) could be the first use of what might be referred to as the &#8220;Ed Hochuli rule.&#8221;</p>
<p>You may remember last year&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.nfl.com/2008/09/14/controversial-end-to-broncos-chargers-game/" target="_blank">botched call in the Chargers–Broncos game</a> where an incomplete pass ruling could not be overruled as a turnover.</p>
<p>In this weekend&#8217;s <em>Sunday Night Football</em> game, the ruling was incomplete. However, in a Rockette-worthy display, it actually caromed of the shoe of Witten into the waiting hands of Phillips. Phillips then trotted to the end zone untouched, although whistles did not blow until he was at the 5-yard line.</p>
<p>Mike Carey overturned the incomplete ruling on replay, but the ball in these situations, even if there is a delayed whistle, will go back to the spot of recovery. Even in the absence of the whistle, the covering official signaled incomplete, which is equivalent to a whistle.</p>
<p>And, yet, I find that this was not the most discussed pick in the game, but <a href="http://www.foxcharlotte.com/dpp/sports/dpgo_09_21_09_jerry_jones_caught_picking_nose_on_tv_3624767" target="_blank">this was</a>.</p>
<p>On a side note, there was to be no doubt <a href="/2009/08/22/108" target="_blank">if a punted ball banged</a> off of the video screen with NBC&#8217;s cameras making sure that they showed the 600-ton hovering HDTV on all punts. Annoyingly, I might add.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/09/21/297/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL makes hasty rule adjustments for overhead objects</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/08/28/115</link>
		<comments>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/08/28/115#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Goodell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scoreboard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebra.benaustro.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After only two full quarters in the new Cowboys Stadium, a punt banged into the overhead video screen, despite its 90-foot clearance. The NFL spent less than a week to make the ruling clear on how such anomalies are handled. From the NFL: After consulting with the Competition Committee and NFL staff, the commissioner said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After only two full quarters in the new Cowboys Stadium, <a href="/2009/08/22/108" target="_blank">a punt banged into the overhead video screen,</a> despite its 90-foot clearance. The NFL spent less than a week to make the ruling clear on how such anomalies are handled.</p>
<p>From the NFL:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">After consulting with the Competition Committee and NFL staff, the commissioner said the following will be in effect for all remaining preseason, regular season, and postseason games of the 2009 season:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<ol>
<li>If a ball in play strikes a video board, guide wire, sky cam, or any other object, the ball will be dead immediately, and the down will be replayed at the previous spot.</li>
<li>If there is not an on-field ruling that the ball struck an object, the Replay Assistant is empowered to initiate a booth review, including if the event occurs prior to the two-minute warning. If, prior to the two-minute warning, no booth review is initiated by the Replay Assistant, a coach’s challenge is permitted under the customary procedures for such a challenge.</li>
<li>In the event the down is replayed:</li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">(a) The game clock will be reset to the time remaining when the snap occurred.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">(b) All penalties will be disregarded, except for personal fouls which will be administered prior to replaying the down.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The press release goes on to state that this rule change is limited to the 2009 season, because Rule 3, Section 1 of the playing rules requires interim changes to be reviewed by the Competition Committee for permanency.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/08/28/115/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

