<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Football Zebras.com &#187; forward fumble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballzebras.com/tag/forward-fumble/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballzebras.com</link>
	<description>A look at the NFL&#039;s officials and the calls they make</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Week 16 &#8220;Offical Review&#8221;: Catch and control, keeping fumble in bounds</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/12/30/1484</link>
		<comments>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/12/30/1484#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Follow-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week 16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jacobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward fumble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fumble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Pereira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Total Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Official Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process of catch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-established in field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidney Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=1484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We haven&#8217;t been reviewing the &#8220;Official Review&#8221; segments on the NFL Network this season since its debut under Carl Johnson. Johnson, the new vice-president of officiating, has not appeared on the network&#8217;s signature program NFL Total Access on a weekly basis, like his predecessor, Mike Pereira. In addition, the segment has less plays and less-controversial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We haven&#8217;t been reviewing the &#8220;Official Review&#8221; segments on the NFL Network this season <a href="/2010/10/17/1101" target="_blank">since its debut</a> under Carl Johnson. Johnson, the new vice-president of officiating, has not appeared on the network&#8217;s signature program <em>NFL Total Access</em> on a weekly basis, like his predecessor, Mike Pereira. In addition, the segment has less plays and less-controversial plays under review than last year.</p>
<p>We happened to catch this week&#8217;s &#8220;Official Review,&#8221; so here&#8217;s the recap:</p>
<ul>
<li>From the Tuesday night game against the Eagles, Vikings receiver Sidney Rice scored a touchdown that was overturned on replay. Rice did not secure the ball through the process of the catch, and the ball touched the ground, rendering it incomplete (<a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/09000d5d81d4f114/Official-Review-Catch-or-no-catch" target="_blank">video</a>).</li>
<li>From the Giants–Packers game, there is more of a process review, rather than analysis of a call. On the fumble by Giants running back Brandon Jacobs, it was apparent from the replay that all players who touched the ball were in bounds (<a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/new-york-giants/09000d5d81d4dc4f/Week-16-Official-Review-bonus-coverage" target="_blank">video</a>). Johnson briefly notes the need for a player to re-establish himself in the field of play, which could have been explained at greater length for an audience, rather than repeating the same points.</li>
</ul>
<p>Johnson is improving his presentation skills slightly since his first appearance, but he appears to have enough material to cover one-third of the segment, requiring him to repeat some of the more basic points in his presentation. Hopefully by next year, the network can coach Johnson to not divulge everything up front, allowing the host to ask follow-up questions to pad out the segment.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/12/30/1484/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 confusing calls in Sunday night game</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/12/15/814</link>
		<comments>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/12/15/814#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ball declared dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Ferrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disqualification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donovan McNabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[down by contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ejection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward fumble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fumble inside 2 minutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home team clock operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indisputable visual evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Parry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moise Fokou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offsetting penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Marinucci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Cole]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Week 14: Eagles at Giants We have three calls for analysis—all three called correctly—from the Eagles–Giants game that will likely end up on this week&#8217;s &#8220;Official Review.&#8221; View the highlights of the game in addition to our analysis: McNabb incomplete or fumble? On a second-and-10 from the Eagles 42, Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb is hit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Week 14: Eagles at Giants</h3>
<p>We have three calls for analysis—all three called correctly—from the Eagles–Giants game that will likely end up on this week&#8217;s &#8220;Official Review.&#8221; <a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d814f3872/NFL-GameDay-Eagles-vs-Giants-highlights" target="_blank">View the highlights</a> of the game in addition to our analysis:</p>
<h4>McNabb incomplete or fumble?</h4>
<p>On a second-and-10 from the Eagles 42, Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb is hit with the ball going forward. The ball was nearly caught out of the air by the Giants and rolled dead (1:24 into <a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d814f3872/NFL-GameDay-Eagles-vs-Giants-highlights" target="_blank">highlight reel</a>). Confusion reigned, as the ball was spotted 10 yards back following the play. Here is what each official ruled on the play:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<div id="attachment_822" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-822" title="mcnabb fumble" src="http://www.footballzebras.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/mcnabb-fumble-300x187.png" alt="Credit: NFL/NBC Sports" width="300" height="187" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Credit: NFL/NBC Sports</p></div>
<p>Referee John Parry considered it a forward fumble by (A) tossing a beanbag marker to show the spot of the fumble.</li>
<li>After the ball hit the ground and as it rolled to a stop, umpire Dan Ferrell assumed a &#8220;hovering&#8221; position (B) anticipating a recovery and a possible pileup on the loose ball.</li>
<li>The line judge, Ron Marinucci, covering a possible interception, ruled it incomplete (C). However, since McNabb&#8217;s hand was empty as it was coming forward, it should not have been ruled incomplete. But, once an incomplete pass is called, the play is dead at that point—although if there was an immediate recovery by the Giants after the incomplete call, it would have been Giants possession at the dead-ball spot.</li>
<li>The replay official could not call for a review because no player picked up the loose ball as the play was killed.</li>
</ul>
<p>In this case, two rules come into play, with the applicable rule/section/article:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>7–4–2.</em> If a loose ball comes to rest anywhere in field and no player attempts to recover, official covering the play should pause momentarily before signaling dead ball (official’s time out).</p>
<p><em>8–7–6. </em>If a fumble by either team occurs after the two-minute warning &#8230; (b) The player who fumbled is the only player of his team who is permitted to recover and advance the ball. (c) If the recovery or catch is by a teammate of the player who fumbled, the ball is dead, and the spot of the next snap is the spot of the fumble.</p></blockquote>
<p>With no one recovering the ball, loosely this translated to an Eagles recovery, as they retain possession. Therefore, they were given the ball at the spot of the fumble, 10 yards behind the line of scrimmage.</p>
<h4>Fumble recovery at 2 seconds?</h4>
<p>On a kickoff return, the Giants fumbled with a recovery by Moise Fokou of the Eagles as the first half expired, but with the aid of the television replay, approximately two seconds remained in the second quarter (no video available).  So why were the Eagles denied the possibility of a field goal to end the half?</p>
<ul>
<li>The replay official cannot intervene in a solely clock-based call or for a fumble recovery in the field of play.</li>
<li>A fumble recovery does not immediately kill the clock. There has to be evidence of a recovery or a significant pileup of players to blow the play dead. By examining the replay, we are able to get the snapshot, but an official would be irresponsible to immediately blow the whistle. What if the ball were to somehow squirt out after the official called it dead?</li>
<li>When the play is ruled dead, the line judge (primarily) is responsible for seeing that the clock is stopped in a reasonable manner. This could cause a delay, and, as is often noted, <em>may </em>go in the favor of the home team on occasion. (We cannot back that assertion up with anything statistical, but prove us wrong if you can point us to evidence.) This delay also is seen when the play clock runs to zero: there is usually a &#8220;beat&#8221; before officials throw a flag, because their eyes can&#8217;t observe both at the same time.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Manning&#8217;s fumble not down by contact</h4>
<p>Giants quarterback Eli Manning, while scrambling for a 15-yard gain, went into a forward dive and lost the ball as he contacted the turf (<a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d814f3872/NFL-GameDay-Eagles-vs-Giants-highlights" target="_blank">video</a> is at 2:50). This was ruled a fumble, as Manning was not contacted as he dove forward. The ground cannot cause a fumble when a player goes down by contact (which can be as little as a defensive player&#8217;s finger).</p>
<p>The replay review <em>could</em> have made a compelling case for the fact that Manning had his jersey grabbed, which caused him to go down. Counting the number of steps is not entirely relevant; if a player stumbles ten steps down the field after contact, it is still down by contact.</p>
<p>But, &#8220;could&#8221; is not good enough, as Parry was looking for &#8220;indisputable visual evidence,&#8221; and so the play, correctly, stands. But in an alternate universe, this play has two different outcomes:</p>
<ul>
<li>I think, had the play been called down by contact by virtue of the jersey tug, that there would not have been indisputable visual evidence to dispute <em>that</em> call.</li>
<li>Had Manning slid feet first, he would have taken advantage of a dead-ball ruling, which would have <em>not</em> resulted in a fumble had he dropped the ball upon hitting the ground:</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p><em>7–4–1. </em>An official shall declare dead ball and the down ended: &#8230; (c) whenever a runner declares himself down by sliding feet first on the ground. The ball is dead at the spot of the ball at the instant the runner so touches the ground.</p></blockquote>
<h4>Also notable</h4>
<p>Trent Cole was ejected with five seconds remaining in the game for throwing a punch. While there were offsetting personal fouls, a disqualification is never withdrawn because of offsetting penalties.</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 363px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">If a fumble by either team occurs after<br />
the two-minute warning:<br />
(a) The ball may be advanced by any opponent.<br />
(b) The player who fumbled is the only player of his team who is permitted to recover<br />
and advance the ball.<br />
(c) If the recovery or catch is by a teammate of the player who fumbled, the ball is dead,<br />
and the spot of the next snap is the spot of the fumble, or the spot of the recovery<br />
if the spot of the recovery is behind the spot of the fumble.If a fumble by either team occurs after<br />
the two-minute warning:<br />
(a) The ball may be advanced by any opponent.<br />
(b) The player who fumbled is the only player of his team who is permitted to recover<br />
and advance the ball.<br />
(c) If the recovery or catch is by a teammate of the player who fumbled, the ball is dead,<br />
and the spot of the next snap is the spot of the fumble, or the spot of the recovery<br />
if the spot of the recovery is behind the spot of the fumble.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/12/15/814/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

