<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Football Zebras.com &#187; Boris Cheek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballzebras.com/tag/boris-cheek/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballzebras.com</link>
	<description>A look at the NFL&#039;s officials and the calls they make</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bucs&#8217; Talib, FJ Cheek have confrontation</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/11/28/1187</link>
		<comments>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/11/28/1187#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aqib Talib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arguing with official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boris Cheek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buccaneers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Cheffers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myron Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pass interference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ravens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=1187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Week 12: Buccaneers at Ravens Tampa-based beat reporters witnessed an argument involving the Buccaneers cornerback Aqib Talib and field judge Boris Cheek. Talib was upset at a pass interference call against fellow cornerback Myron Lewis (Update 11/29: NFL.com has video of the penalty) and apparently confronted Cheek after the game near the locker room. According [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Week 12: Buccaneers at Ravens</h3>
<div style="float:right;"><!-- LIFE IMAGE 83799201 --><script src="http://www.life.com/embed/index/js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
LIFEembedDrawImage2('83799201','260');
// ]]&gt;</script></div>
<p>Tampa-based beat reporters witnessed an argument involving the Buccaneers cornerback Aqib Talib and field judge Boris Cheek. Talib was upset at a pass interference call against fellow cornerback Myron Lewis <em>(<strong>Update 11/29: </strong>NFL.com has </em><em><a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d81c7cecd/Raheem-reacts-to-flag" target="_blank">video</a> of the penalty)</em> and apparently confronted Cheek after the game near the locker room. <a href="http://www2.tbo.com/content/2010/nov/28/282219/talib-official-have-heated-exchange-after-game/sports-bucs/" target="_blank">According to Anwar Richardson</a> in the <em>Tampa Tribune</em> and <em>St. Petersburg Times&#8217;</em> Rick Stroud, the two-way critique between Talib and Cheek progressed like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Talib: &#8220;You made a pussy call.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/NFLSTROUD/status/9052418058747904" target="_blank">Cheek</a>: &#8220;You played like a pussy.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/NFLSTROUD/status/9053602207244288" target="_blank">Talib</a>: &#8220;I&#8217;ll (hit) you in your bitch ass mouth.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Talib had to be restrained by his teammates. (Why does this remind me more of <em>South Park</em>?) The game supervisor would not comment since the incident did not happen on the field. A league spokesman said they will look into the issue. Carl Cheffers is the crew chief.</p>
<p><em>File photo of Boris Cheek from 2008.</em><br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballzebras.com/2010/11/28/1187/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Week 5 &#8220;Official Review&#8221;: Fair-catch interference, fumbled fumbles, &#8216;fishy&#8217; call</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/10/16/470</link>
		<comments>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/10/16/470#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Follow-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antwaan Randle El]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Boyleston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boris Cheek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Westbrook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Cheffers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair catch interference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improper spot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Lamberth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Triplette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kent Payne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Pereira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Spanier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiple fouls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Official Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[picked-up flag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Eisen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Stelljes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrong media call]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s &#8220;Official Review&#8221; by league vice-president of officiating, Mike Pereira, featured several interesting plays from Week 5, leading to a lot of discussion here (video, Part 1 and Part 2): As pointed out in our comments, there was a bizarre fair-catch play in the Redskins–Panthers game. Basically, the Panthers, while punting, had blocked Brian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s &#8220;Official Review&#8221; by league vice-president of officiating, Mike Pereira, featured several interesting plays from Week 5, leading to a lot of discussion here (video, <a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/09000d5d8136a6b6/Official-Review-Week-5" target="_blank">Part 1</a> and <a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/09000d5d8136aa63/Official-Review-Week-5-bonus-coverage" target="_blank">Part 2</a>):</p>
<ul>
<li>As pointed out in our comments, there was a bizarre fair-catch play in the Redskins–Panthers game. Basically, the Panthers, while punting, had blocked Brian Westbrook of the Redskins into his recevier Antwaan Randle El. Not only did the block interfere with Randle El&#8217;s opportunity to make a fair catch, but the ball deflected off of Westbrook, creating a live ball. This was <em>not</em> called fair-catch interference, because Westbrook and the Panthers special-teamer (Quinton Teal) were actively engaged in blocking each other. According to Rule 10, Section 1, Article 1, Item 1 of the <em>NFL Rule Book</em>:</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>It is interference if a player of the kicking team contacts the receiver, or causes a passive player of either team to contact the receiver, before or simultaneous to his touching the ball.</p></blockquote>
<ul>
<li>A taunting call that was assessed in the Patriots–Broncos game was, on replay, showing the side judge Jeff Lamberth throwing his flag prior to the taunting incident. Pereira knowledged this &#8220;looks fishy,&#8221; but, it turns out there were originally multiple fouls on the play. Lamberth was flagging an illegal helmet hit, while back judge Dino Paganelli flagged for the taunt. Headlinesman Kent Payne came in afterward to say that it wasn&#8217;t a helmet-to-helmet hit, and that flag (the one seen in the video) was picked up. This left the taunting foul, which came in off screen, as the only penalty called on the play. However, referee Carl Cheffers should have stated in the announcement that the flag for helmet-to-helmet contact was picked up (even though there actually was helmet-to-helmet contact).</li>
<li>An apparent fumble in the Raiders–Giants game was ruled down by contact, which the Giants challenged. Then referee John Parry explained the dead-ball ruling was not down by contact, but due to forward progress being stopped. The challenge flag was picked up, since forward progress is not reviewable on fumble plays.</li>
<li>An apparent fumble in the Bengals–Ravens game lead to a rarely seen improper spotting of the ball. This play had a major breakdown in officiating mechanics, where the redundancy in the system failed terribly.</li>
<li style="list-style-type: none">First, Line judge Michael Spanier (seen in the replay) ruled a fumble and recovery by the Bengals.
<ul>
<li>Failure point #1: Playing this as a fumble, he should have marked the spot of recovery with his beanbag.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li style="list-style-type: none">Then, the field judge Boris Cheek came in to declare down by contact. This was challenged by the Bengals, and upheld as down by contact.
<ul>
<li>Failure point #2: Upon declaring a replay decision, the referee (Jeff Triplette)  and the replay assistant (Bob Boyleston) must determine down, distance, yard line, and the game time. This is not part of the referee&#8217;s 60-second window to make a decision on the play call itself. The yard line, at least, was not discussed or was miscommunicated.</li>
<li>Failure point #3: Upon spotting the ball ready for play, all seven officials did not realize the ball was placed 4½ yards behind the dead-ball spot. This should have been readily apparent to the headlinesman (Steve Stelljes) since the play, with the bad spot, was a –1 yard net, when the reception was clearly past the line of scrimmage.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Incorrect spots (as opposed to disputed judgment calls) happen very infrequently, but when they do, they are major errors that affect one&#8217;s playoff eligibility as an official. While the official game records show a –1 yard play, the officials can expect a –3 on their season scorecards.</p>
<p>In passing, there were two comments by the NFL Network&#8217;s Rich Eisen that should have been corrected by Periera. First, Eisen referred to giving the kick receiver that signals fair catch a &#8220;halo&#8221; area to allow him to catch the ball. The halo rule on a fair catch is an old college rule which did not permit a member of the kicking team within a certain distance of the fair-catch-signalling player. This is not a rule employed above the high school level. Secondly, Eisen remarked that if one official saw two fouls, that he should have marked the second one with his hat. In a case were there are two fouls at one enforcement point, the flag is suffice. (The flag is primarily an enforcement marker by the official, so dropping a hat to mark the same spot is unneccessary.)<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/10/16/470/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incomplete pass not called on key catch of Steelers opening drive</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/10/05/408</link>
		<comments>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/10/05/408#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boris Cheek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coach's challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Spanier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Night Football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Week 4: Chargers at Steelers Pro Football Talk noticed a missed call on the Steelers opening drive during Sunday Night Football. (video) On the third offensive play of the game, Ben Roethlisberger (who just completed two passes on the first two plays) connected with Mike Wallace for 35 yards, taking the ball down to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Week 4: Chargers at Steelers</h3>
<p><em>Pro Football Talk</em> <a href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/05/norv-missed-a-chance-to-make-an-early-challenge/" target="_blank">noticed a missed call</a> on the Steelers opening drive during <em>Sunday Night Football. </em>(<a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-videos/09000d5d8132c313/Mike-Wallace-Highlight-WK-04-vs-Chargers-2009" target="_blank">video</a>)</p>
<p>On the third offensive play of the game, Ben Roethlisberger (who just completed two passes on the first two plays) connected with Mike Wallace for 35 yards, taking the ball down to the Chargers 14-yard line. Head coach Norv Turner could have had an easy reversal, though, had he thrown the red challenge flag.</p>
<p>Wallace was only able to get one foot in bounds before being driven out by Steve Gregory. Since the &#8220;force-out&#8221; rule has been rescinded, this should have been ruled an incomplete pass.</p>
<p>This was under the jurisdiction primarily of the field judge, Boris Cheek. The line judge, Michael Spanier, comes in to spot the ball. Both missed an obvious non-catch call.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/10/05/408/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How is forward progress not stopped when player lands 3 yards back?</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/10/05/392</link>
		<comments>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/10/05/392#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boris Cheek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coach's challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Hester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Freeman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Logan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Night Football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Week 4: Chargers at Steelers In the Sunday Night Football game, the Chargers special teams player Jacob Hester is credited with a heads-up, 41-yard fumble-return touchdown. However, it is confusing how the Steelers punt returner Steve Logan was driven back three yards in control of the ball without being ruled down by forward progress. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Week 4: Chargers at Steelers</h3>
<p>In the <em>Sunday Night Football</em> game, the Chargers special teams player Jacob Hester is credited with a heads-up, 41-yard fumble-return touchdown. However, it is confusing how the Steelers punt returner Steve Logan was driven back three yards in control of the ball without being ruled down by forward progress.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d81328f1b/Hester-heads-up-play" target="_blank">The video of the play</a> shows clearly that Logan achieved the 44-yard line, with the fumble occurring at the 41.</p>
<p>The covering official was back judge Steve Freeman, who marked the point of recovery with his beanbag. The field judge, Boris Cheek, was covering the sideline at the 25 (you will see his hat marking that a player stepped out of bounds), so he was in no position to judge forward progress.</p>
<address><strong>Update:</strong> As stated in the comments, the side judge, indeed has coverage on kicks to determine forward progress. I was unable to see his positioning from the video. The side judge in this game was 19-year veteran David Wyant.<br />
</address>
<p>There was a coach&#8217;s challenge, but forward progress could not have been overturned on replay.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/10/05/392/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

