<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 confusing calls in Sunday night game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/12/15/814/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/12/15/814</link>
	<description>A look at the NFL&#039;s officials and the calls they make</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:35:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Manwiller</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/12/15/814/comment-page-1#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Manwiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=814#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>If a flagrant face mask personal foul is committed against the running back after he fumbles the ball who has possession?

Thanks,

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a flagrant face mask personal foul is committed against the running back after he fumbles the ball who has possession?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Austro</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/12/15/814/comment-page-1#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=814#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>I think that Mike Pereira&#039;s Official Review segment got overloaded with some compelling plays from the Eagles-Giants game. Usually he reviews four plays a week, and this week, the three we mentioned were under Official Review.

If I can catch a replay, I will see if I can get a post on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Mike Pereira&#8217;s Official Review segment got overloaded with some compelling plays from the Eagles-Giants game. Usually he reviews four plays a week, and this week, the three we mentioned were under Official Review.</p>
<p>If I can catch a replay, I will see if I can get a post on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Redding</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/12/15/814/comment-page-1#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Redding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballzebras.com/?p=814#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>I am wondering why the Falcon interception of Brees was not covered this week.  I am not saying it would have made the game but the play looked clean form my viewpoint it looked like the defender and reciever we&#039;re both playing the ball, so why was this not removed.  Also not to pile on but in the 1st NO ATL game Ryan was intercepted by Jabari Greer, on the replay you could clearly see that Greer hit Reciever White while the ball was in the air completely stopping White from running his route.  just want to understand why these plays were not reviewed.  thnaks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering why the Falcon interception of Brees was not covered this week.  I am not saying it would have made the game but the play looked clean form my viewpoint it looked like the defender and reciever we&#8217;re both playing the ball, so why was this not removed.  Also not to pile on but in the 1st NO ATL game Ryan was intercepted by Jabari Greer, on the replay you could clearly see that Greer hit Reciever White while the ball was in the air completely stopping White from running his route.  just want to understand why these plays were not reviewed.  thnaks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
