<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL makes hasty rule adjustments for overhead objects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/08/28/115/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/08/28/115</link>
	<description>A look at the NFL&#039;s officials and the calls they make</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:35:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Austro</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/08/28/115/comment-page-1#comment-1676</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Austro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebra.benaustro.com/?p=115#comment-1676</guid>
		<description>I doubt that any player would be able to accurately do so &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; make it look like a forward pass. There is a 5-yard penalty and a 10-second runoff for actions that conserve time. There is wide latitude afforded to the referee to judge that. Such a deliberate throw would not have the arc of a regular pass, and the intent would be obvious. This is not so obvious with a punt, because its trajectory can realistically follow such a path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that any player would be able to accurately do so <em>and</em> make it look like a forward pass. There is a 5-yard penalty and a 10-second runoff for actions that conserve time. There is wide latitude afforded to the referee to judge that. Such a deliberate throw would not have the arc of a regular pass, and the intent would be obvious. This is not so obvious with a punt, because its trajectory can realistically follow such a path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Red</title>
		<link>http://www.footballzebras.com/2009/08/28/115/comment-page-1#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebra.benaustro.com/?p=115#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>What about using this rule to a team&#039;s advantage? Check out these unintended consequences of the rule change. Why spike the ball when pegging the scoreboard lets you keep the down and reset the clock?

http://www.east-coast-bias.com/2009/08/nfl-orders-do-overs-for-dallas.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about using this rule to a team&#8217;s advantage? Check out these unintended consequences of the rule change. Why spike the ball when pegging the scoreboard lets you keep the down and reset the clock?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.east-coast-bias.com/2009/08/nfl-orders-do-overs-for-dallas.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.east-coast-bias.com/2009/08/nfl-orders-do-overs-for-dallas.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
